A bit of a collection of thoughts/articles in this post: An interesting, but short article. Another unrelated but also interesting article. I'd really like try one of these. A friend sent me this and I think his message is important:
Sunday, November 25, 2007
Saturday, November 24, 2007
Morality Quiz
Interesting quiz. Kinda reminds me of the scenario I made up in one of my first posts. Think about it.
Wednesday, November 21, 2007
News
Ok so I am really fed up with mainstream media. This morning on the radio all I heard about was how busy the travel season is this year. Radio program was giving advice...give yourself extra travel time when going to the airport, follow TSA guidelines. Come on. This is news??????? For a full 30 minutes the radio program was interviewing people about their holiday travel plans. WHO CARES. That is not news. After the 30 minutes the first "news" story was to tell us that the Hollywood writers strike is still on. Thanks. First of all people don't want to talk about the real issues so they talk about holiday travel plans. Then, once that gets old they talk about entertainment news. Do you think that Americans after all the reruns start showing now that the writers are on strike will actually pick up a book and READ?
Start by listening to DN! and reading THIS.
Start by listening to DN! and reading THIS.
Tuesday, November 20, 2007
Reading. Denial.
Two article posts here. Not enough time to comment, but I think they're both good reads.
Study Links Drop in Test Scores to a Decline in Time Spent Reading
Denial Makes the World Go Round
Study Links Drop in Test Scores to a Decline in Time Spent Reading
Denial Makes the World Go Round
Monday, November 19, 2007
Death Penalty
Does the death penalty actually save lives? An interesting article. I really am a believer in the incentive theory. The article does make a good point in that it is doubtful that the type of people who might commit a murder are unlikely the ones who will consider the consequences and fall under the incentive theory. I am really starting to get interested in reading econometric studies related to human behavior.
Monday, November 12, 2007
Kids and Cost
Man I'm on a roll today just finding these interesting articles. This one is about the cost of raising children. It was interesting to read the reader comments. I was not surprised by the comments at all. Everyone who has kids and commented said it was worth it. Of course they are going to say that. Everyone who doesn't have kids are glad that they don't. Again, of course. Everyone makes their decision whether that be kids, or anything else in life and then tries to justify it if someone else challenges them. It's not a novel concept. Generally, people make decisions based on what they feel is the best for themselves or what is in their best interest. I'm pretty sure that this is a philosophical principle that has already existed for ages. When people say that volunteering breaks this philosophy I would argue well maybe not really. Say for example that I volunteer my Saturday afternoon mentoring "at risk" children. By doing this I keep them "off the street". How do I benefit? Well the kids are being kept occupied so that they are not using their time to do something else that might be detrimental to society. If for example I am helping tutor them they might become a doctor one day and save my life. Who knows. If I am helping them stay in shape then maybe they won't be overweight and will help keep health care costs low. I am benefiting really just maybe not immediately.
I think both sides have valid arguments. People who have kids argued that doing so helps them live fulfilling lives. The parents then are benefiting. People who choose not to argue that they have more free time and money. They are also benefiting from their decision. Looking at it from your own perspective, sure you think you've made the right choice. For you. That's it. It's the right choice for you, and what people need to stop doing, whether it be having kids, choosing a religion, anything really, is to stop telling other people that their decision was wrong.
I think both sides have valid arguments. People who have kids argued that doing so helps them live fulfilling lives. The parents then are benefiting. People who choose not to argue that they have more free time and money. They are also benefiting from their decision. Looking at it from your own perspective, sure you think you've made the right choice. For you. That's it. It's the right choice for you, and what people need to stop doing, whether it be having kids, choosing a religion, anything really, is to stop telling other people that their decision was wrong.
Question
This question just came to my mind for some reason, but I wonder:
Is there a correlation between how early in one's life he/she gets married and how religious they consider themselves? What about the I.Q.'s of the two people involved?
An interesting question because I'm not sure how you measure "religiosity", but I'd be interested if anyone has ever done a study out there on that. I'd also be interested in learning about divorce rates across religions and race. I'm pretty sure in remembering from a college economics class that there have been studies investigating the correlation between parent education levels, income and the amount of children they have.
Is there a correlation between how early in one's life he/she gets married and how religious they consider themselves? What about the I.Q.'s of the two people involved?
An interesting question because I'm not sure how you measure "religiosity", but I'd be interested if anyone has ever done a study out there on that. I'd also be interested in learning about divorce rates across religions and race. I'm pretty sure in remembering from a college economics class that there have been studies investigating the correlation between parent education levels, income and the amount of children they have.
Race and Relationships
Race is surfacing yet again in an article that I find interesting. I am definitely going to read the papers cited in the article. I've started to become more interested in sociology and psychology lately for some reason and understanding why people are who they are and why they act the way they do. I was also interested in that Christmas and deadweight loss paper. Ah, bringing back memories of economics from college. Maybe I should have been a social psychology major...
Science and Race
An article from the NY Times that rolls up two of the topics I'm interested into one story: race and science. First off I am going to say that I am a big believer in science. I always have been and don't see that changing anytime soon. This topic however of whether one race is intellectually inferior or superior to another I think is an extremely difficult question to answer. First of all what exactly is intelligence? Does it mean that just because one person scores higher on a certain test that he/she is more intelligent than someone else? I would say no. I don't really understand how intelligence can be explained on a racial level. It just doesn't seem possible to me. The Nature vs. Nurture hypothesis also comes into play here I believe. Its undeniable that some people are born with abilities and traits that are not common. Sure, someone may have the knack for remember useless pieces of trivia or solving calculus problems, but does this make them more intelligent than someone else? Is intelligence measured by one's ability to solve problems? Memorize facts? Having a "good day" when the test is administered? I don't know. I'm not sure that science can answer the question of a correlation between race and mental capacity. I think the brain is too complex and there are too many other factors that affect the development of a human.
Saturday, November 10, 2007
Information Sources
Yet another important and interesting article from the NY Times. The article talks about increasing competition by allowing more independent information sources be allowed into the market without being overruled by the media giants. I think that this is extremely important. One organization that I recently discovered is Democracy Now! which is an independent new source that I listen to/read daily.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)